Mentors & Areas of Interest

Ph.D. Admission Requirements

Ph.D. Application Process

 

Ph.D. Commmittee Chair

Dr. Jeffrey Greenman 

 

Field Coordinators

Dr. Daniel Block

Dr. Daniel Treier


Program Administrator

Dr. Chris Vlachos

 

Faculty

Dr. Jeffrey Barbeau

Dr. Daniel Block

Dr. George Kalantzis

Dr. Douglas Moo

Dr. Nicholas Perrin

Dr. Richard Schultz

Dr. Daniel Treier

Dr. Kevin Vanhoozer

 

Ph.D. Student Helps

Handbook

Dissertation Style Guide

Submitting Your Dissertation
UMI Submission Instructions

 

Ph.D. Student & Alumni News

Ph.D. Alumni Testimonials

Ph.D. Published Dissertations

Ph.D. Student and Alumni Vocational Placements

 

More Information

Biblical & Theological Studies Department



 

New Books: Published Ph.D. Dissertations

The doctoral program in Biblical & Theological Studies began in 2002.  Dissertations from the first graduates of the program are now being published by Brill, T&T Clark, Wipf & Stock, and Walter de Gruyter.  The following have been released and are available for purchase (click on the book to order online).


 

She Must and Shall Go Free: Paul's Isaianic Gospel in Galatians

By Matthew S. Harmon, Ph.D. 2006

Walter de Gruyter 2010

 

Scholars have long recognized the importance of Paul´s citations from the Pentateuch for understanding the argument of Galatians. But what has not been fully appreciated is the key role that Isaiah plays in shaping what Paul says and how he says it, even though he cites Isaiah explicitly only once (Isaiah 54:1 in Galatians 4:27). Using an intertextual approach to trace more subtle appropriations of Scripture (i.e., allusions, echoes and thematic parallels), Harmon argues that Isaiah 49-54 in particular has shaped the structure of Paul´s argument and the content of his theological reflection in Galatians. Each example of Isaianic influence is situated within its original context as well as its new context in Galatians. Attention is also paid to how those same Isaianic texts were interpreted in Second Temple Judaism, providing the larger interpretive context within which Paul read Scripture. The result is fresh light shed on Paul's self-understanding as an apostle to the Gentiles, the content of his gospel message, his reading of the Abraham story and the larger structure of Galatians.

 

 

The Christ's Faith: A Dogmatic Account

By R. Michael Allen, Ph.D. 2007

T&T Clark 2009

 

The Christ’s Faith coheres with orthodox Christology and Reformation soteriology, and needs to be affirmed to properly confirm the true humanity of the incarnate Son. Without addressing the interpretation of the Pauline phrase pistis christou, this study offers a theological rationale for an exegetical possibility and enriches a dogmatic account of the humanity of the Christ.

The coherence of the Christ’s faith is shown in two ways. First, the objection of Thomas Aquinas is refuted by demonstrating that faith is fitting for the incarnate Son. Second, a theological ontology is offered which affirms divine perfection and transcendence in qualitative fashion, undergirding a Chalcedonian and Reformed Christology. Thus, the humanity of the Christ may be construed as a fallen human nature assumed by the person of the Word and sanctified by the Holy Spirit.

The dogmatic location of The Christ’s Faith is sketched by suggesting its (potential) function within three influential theological systems: Thomas Aquinas, federal theology, and Karl Barth. Furthermore, the soteriological role of the doctrine is demonstrated by showing the theological necessity of faith for valid obedience before God.

The Law and the Knowledge of Good and Evil: The Edenic Background of the Catalytic Operation of the Law in Paul

By Chris A. Vlachos, Ph.D. 2006

Wipf & Stock 2009

 

First Corinthians 15:56, "The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law," is both puzzling and neglected. It is puzzling since there appears to be no precursor in 1 Corinthians to the law-critical statement found there. It is neglected because of its size. Nevertheless, the short verse offers the opportunity to analyze in a rudimentary state Paul's law-sin notion that appears full-blown in Romans, and the absence of a polemical setting allows scholars to examine a law-critical statement issued during a polemical lull. In The Law and Knowledge of Good and Evil, Vlachos weighs attempts to explain the presence of 1 Cor 15:56 in 1 Corinthians and argues that the Genesis Fall narrative, where the tempter plied his seductions by way of the commandment, provides the theological substructure to Paul's understanding of the law's provocation of sin. In doing so, Vlachos contends that Paul reaches the historical high water mark of his polemic against the salvific efficacy of the law by locating a law-sin nexus in Eden, and, contrary to some recent perspectives on Paul, he argues that the edenically informed axiom in 1 Cor 15:56 suggests that Paul's fundamental concern with the law was rooted in primordial rather than ethnic soil. While studies of Paul and the law have tended to bypass Eden, The Law and Knowledge of Good and Evil breaks ground by moving the argument beyond Second Temple Judaism to the Genesis Fall account, where the prohibition against partaking of the knowledge of good and evil led to the knowledge of sin.

Revealing the Mysterion: The Use of Mystery in Daniel and Second Temple Judaism with Its Bearing on First Corinthians

By Benjamin L. Gladd, Ph.D. 2008

Walter de Gruyter 2008 

 

Scholars largely agree that the NT term “mysterion” is a terminus technicus, originating from Daniel. This project traces the word in the Dead Sea Scrolls and other sectors of Judaism. Like Daniel, the term consistently retains eschatological connotations. The monograph then examines how mystery functions within 1 Corinthians and seeks to explain why the term is often employed. The apocalyptic term concerns the Messiah reigning in the midst of defeat, eschatological revelations and tongues, charismatic exegesis, and the transformation of believers into the image of the last Adam.


Echoes of Scripture in the Letter of Paul to the Colossians

By Christopher A. Beetham, Ph.D. 2005

SBL 2010

 

While the use of the Old Testament in the New Testament has captured the attention of biblical scholars over the years, no study has been devoted to the presence of Scripture in Colossians, largely because there are no explicit quotations in Colossians. With the introduction of literary intertextuality into the discipline, however, scholars have begun to devote more attention to the NT authors’ less explicit references to Scripture, often labelled as ‘allusions’ and/or ‘echoes.’ Scholars, however, continue to debate what constitutes an allusion or echo, or how one validates a given proposal as such. This study proposes new definitions of these terms and offers a methodology on how to detect and validate them, using Colossians as a test case.